Back to Tools
RISK MANAGEMENT

Monte Carlo Simulator

Visualize 100 possible futures of your strategy. Discover your real risks before risking your actual capital.

Strategy Parameters

Starting Capital$10,000
Win Rate55%
Risk : Reward1 : 2
Risk per Trade1%
Number of Trades100

Mathematical Expectancy

+65.0%

For every $1 risked, you earn on average $0.65

Profitability%
Risk of Ruin%

Monte Carlo Simulation (100 Parallel Universes)

Profit
Break-even
Ruin

Average Outcome

$

Median Outcome

$

Worst Drawdown

-%

Average Drawdown

-%

How to interpret these results?

Each line represents a complete simulation of your strategy. If 30% of lines end below your starting capital, it means that even with a winning strategy, you have a 30% chance of losing money over that period. Monte Carlo does not predict the future; it shows you the range of possibilities.

The Ultimate Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation

Understanding variance so you are never surprised by the market again

You backtested your strategy. It shows +40% over the last two years. Confident, you start trading live. Three weeks later, you are down -15%. Is your strategy broken? Has the market changed? Probably not.

You are simply a victim of variance -- the natural dispersion of results around their mean. A strategy with a 55% win rate will inevitably experience streaks of 5, 6, or even 10 consecutive losses. It is mathematically guaranteed. The question is not "if" but "when".

Monte Carlo simulation is the tool that lets you visualize all possible futures of your strategy. Instead of seeing a single equity line (your backtest), you see 100, 1,000, or 10,000 lines -- each representing a different sequence of wins and losses with the same statistics. It is the difference between looking at yesterday's weather and understanding the climate.

The Nuclear Origin of Monte Carlo

The name "Monte Carlo" evokes the glamorous casinos of Monaco, but its origin is far darker. The method was invented during World War II by two mathematical geniuses: Stanislaw Ulam and John von Neumann.

1944: The Manhattan Project

Ulam and von Neumann were working at Los Alamos on the most secret project in history: the atomic bomb. They needed to model the behavior of neutrons in fissile material -- how they bounce, get absorbed, or trigger further fissions.

The differential equations were impossible to solve analytically. Ulam, recovering from surgery, spent his time playing Solitaire. He realized that instead of calculating the exact probability of winning (a complex calculation), he could simply play hundreds of games and count the winning percentage.

The Revolutionary Idea

Ulam applied this idea to neutrons: instead of solving equations, simulate thousands of individual neutrons, each following a random path based on known probabilities. The average of all these paths gave an excellent approximation of actual behavior.

The code name "Monte Carlo" was chosen in reference to Ulam's uncle, a compulsive gambler who regularly borrowed money to go to the Monte Carlo casino. The irony was perfect: using randomness to solve deterministic problems.

1944

Invented at Los Alamos for the atomic bomb

1950s

Adopted by nuclear physicists

1980s

Entered finance (Value at Risk)

Today

Standard for all risk management

How Does the Simulation Work?

Imagine your strategy as a loaded die:

  • 45% of the time: You lose 1R (your risk)
  • 55% of the time: You win 2R (your ratio)

The simulator "rolls this die" for each trade, then starts over 100 times from scratch. This gives you 100 different equity curves, all based on the same statistics.

The Law of Large Numbers

Over 10,000 trades, luck cancels out and only expectancy matters. But over 100 trades, variance dominates. This is the zone where Monte Carlo reveals the real dangers.

1

Define the parameters

Win rate, risk/reward ratio, risk per trade, number of trades. These are your actual statistics.

2

Generate the sequences

For each simulation, generate a random sequence of wins/losses based on your probabilities.

3

Analyze the distribution

Look at the worst case, best case, median, and percentage of losing scenarios.

Backtesting vs Monte Carlo

Backtesting

  • A single historical sequence
  • Survivorship bias (you only see what worked)
  • Overfitting possible
  • Does not show the worst possible scenarios

Backtesting shows you what happened, not what could have happened.

Monte Carlo

  • Hundreds of possible sequences
  • Shows the complete distribution of outcomes
  • Identifies worst possible drawdowns
  • Calculates the real probability of ruin

Monte Carlo shows you everything that can happen with your statistics.

Typical Profile Analysis

The Sniper (Low Win Rate)

Win Rate

35%

R:R

1:3

Risk

2%

Monte Carlo Diagnosis

Despite a positive expectancy (+0.40R), this profile regularly suffers streaks of 8-12 consecutive losses. The simulator shows that in 25% of cases, it will hit a -35% drawdown before taking off.

Risk: Psychological breakdown before the statistics materialize.

The Scalper (High Win Rate)

Win Rate

68%

R:R

1:1

Risk

0.5%

Monte Carlo Diagnosis

Very smooth and steady equity curve. The simulator shows a worst drawdown of only -12% across 100 simulations. Slow but consistent growth.

Ideal for: Prop Firms, large capital management, risk-averse traders.

Critical Application: Prop Firms

If you trade for a Prop Firm (FTMO, The Funded Trader, etc.), Monte Carlo is not a luxury -- it is an absolute necessity. Why? Because your "ruin" is not at $0. It is at your Max Allowed Drawdown (typically 10%).

The Crash Test

  1. 1. Enter your real statistics in the simulator above
  2. 2. Run 100 simulations
  3. 3. Look at the "Worst Drawdown" metric

If "Worst Drawdown" > 10%, you are playing Russian roulette with your funded account.

Even with a long-term profitable strategy, you have a non-zero probability of losing your account before the statistics materialize.

The Solution

Reduce your risk per trade until the simulated "Worst Drawdown" is comfortably below your Prop Firm limit. If your limit is 10%, aim for a worst drawdown of 6-7% maximum to have a safety margin.

Limitations of Monte Carlo

Monte Carlo is a powerful tool, but it is not a crystal ball. Here are its important limitations:

Independence assumption

Monte Carlo assumes each trade is independent of the previous one. In reality, markets have regimes (trending vs ranging) and your psychology changes after a losing streak.

Garbage in, garbage out

If your input statistics are wrong (overestimated win rate, inflated ratio), the simulations will be misleading. Use data from 100+ trades minimum.

Cannot predict black swans

A flash crash, a war, a broker bankruptcy... Monte Carlo cannot simulate events it has never seen.

Simplified distribution

The basic simulator uses a binomial distribution (win or loss). In reality, your wins and losses vary. Advanced versions use log-normal distributions.

How to Use This Simulator

1

Collect your real statistics

Analyze your last 100 trades minimum. Calculate your real win rate, average win, and average loss. Be honest -- embellished numbers only lie to yourself.

2

Enter your parameters

Input your capital, win rate, R:R ratio, and risk per trade. The risk should be what you actually use, not what you think you use.

3

Analyze the worst case

Look at the 'Worst Drawdown'. Are you psychologically and financially capable of enduring this decline? If not, reduce your risk per trade.

4

Check the probability of ruin

For a Prop Firm with 10% max DD, your risk of ruin should be 0% or close to 0%. For your own capital, aim for less than 5%.

5

Compare average and median

If the average is very different from the median, it means a few exceptional simulations are pulling the average up. Trust the median more.

6

Iterate and optimize

Adjust risk per trade until you find the sweet spot: acceptable growth + bearable drawdown. It is often more conservative than you think.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

How many trades should I simulate?

Simulate a period matching your horizon. If you take 20 trades/month and want to see your year, simulate 240 trades. For Prop Firms, simulate the period of your challenge (often unlimited now, so 100-200 trades is a good start).

Why is my real curve different from the simulation?

Monte Carlo assumes each trade is independent and your statistics are constant. In reality: 1) Markets have different regimes, 2) Your psychology changes after losses, 3) Your stats can drift. Use Monte Carlo as a guide, not an exact prediction.

How do I reduce my risk of ruin to 0%?

Mathematically, zero risk does not exist. But you can make it negligible (< 0.1%) by drastically reducing your position size. Cutting your risk in half reduces the risk of ruin exponentially, not linearly.

Are 100 simulations enough?

For an initial analysis, yes. For critical decisions (going live, choosing risk for a Prop Firm), increase to 1,000 or 10,000 simulations. The more simulations you have, the more reliable the extreme percentiles.

Does Monte Carlo work for scalping?

Yes, but with a caveat: transaction costs weigh heavier in scalping. Make sure your statistics include commissions and spreads. A 60% win rate can become 50% after fees if your wins are small.

Can I use Monte Carlo for options?

Yes, but it is more complex. Options have asymmetric gain/loss profiles. You will need to adapt the simulator for variable rather than fixed wins/losses. Specialized tools exist for this.

What is the difference between average and median outcome?

The average is pulled up by exceptional simulations. The median is the middle result - 50% of simulations do better, 50% do worse. For planning, the median is often more realistic.

How does Monte Carlo compare to the Kelly Criterion?

They are complementary. Kelly tells you the theoretical optimal size. Monte Carlo shows you the volatility of that size. Often, Monte Carlo will convince you to use a fraction of Kelly to reduce drawdowns.

Conclusion: Seeing the Invisible

Monte Carlo is a tool of vision. It lets you see what your backtest does not show: the alternate paths, the worst scenarios, the true distribution of your possible outcomes.

Nuclear physicists used it to understand the invisible (neutron behavior). Traders use it to understand the unpredictable (market variance). In both cases, the goal is the same: making informed decisions in the face of uncertainty.

Remember these three principles:

  1. Backtests lie by omission -- They show only one path among millions of possibilities.
  2. Variance is your true enemy -- A profitable strategy can ruin you if sizing is wrong.
  3. The worst case is your guide -- Size your risk to survive the worst scenario, not the average one.

Use this simulator before every major decision: going live, changing position size, attempting a Prop Firm challenge. Your future self will thank you.

Master Your Risk

Monte Carlo has shown you your risks. Now use the Kelly Criterion to calculate your optimal position size and the position calculator to apply it.